version control - Separated branch for each bugfix vs graft from dev branch -
I have an application with 3 environments - Dev, Forum and Production.
Bug fixes and features typically have 2/3 commitments.
Currently I use the Mercurial Project for myself, but I can not decide how to go, it is best to use named branches, but I do not know that 1/2 / This is right for 3. I think grafts also look promising.
So I have a question that if I need to be able to separate the different changes, then what do I need?
Single defect of intensive use of named branches After some time, HG branches
I like to use nominated branches because it gives a recoverable history and more polluted log of change: Repeat changes with coherent changes. The article instead I see that merge for each integration of a work repository identifies all merge-target
Comments
Post a Comment